ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

mnnnnn b

Article metrics

View details

10

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

\section{} Microplastics (plastic particles smaller than 5 mm) are among the most widespread environmental pollutants, and monitoring them requires both counting particles and identifying their polymer type. Spectroscopic methods such as FTIR and Raman are accurate but slow and costly. Nile Red staining offers a fast, inexpensive alternative, as stained plastics fluoresce under blue light, but turning fluorescence images into quantitative data requires reliable automated detection and classification. We used the public Nile Red dataset of Rermborirak et al. (2025), covering six polymer classes (ABS, Nylon, PE, PET, PS and PVC). A systematic audit found that 1,012 of the 2,566 published images (39.4%) were near-duplicates, many with bounding-box labels rotated by 180°. After de-duplication, 1,554 unique images (23,832 labelled particles) were split 70/15/15 into training, validation and test sets, stratified by polymer class. Five YOLO detectors (YOLOv8s, YOLOv9s, YOLOv10s, YOLO11s and YOLO26s) were trained for 60 epochs at 640 pixels from COCO-pretrained weights, all with identical hyperparameters. The best architecture, YOLO26s, was then fine-tuned for 100 further epochs at 640 and 960 pixels, with model selection based on validation performance only. Evaluation combined standard detection metrics with an independent error analysis separating located, misclassified, missed and spurious particles. YOLO26s, YOLO11s and YOLOv10s performed equivalently (test mAP50-95 0.822–0.828), about 3 points above YOLOv8s (0.795), the architecture used in the source study. The final YOLO26s model, fine-tuned at 960 pixels, achieved test precision 0.909, recall 0.904, mAP50 0.962 and mAP50-95 0.876, a gain of 8.1 points over YOLOv8s. At a confidence threshold of 0.25 it located 96.0% of labelled particles, and only 0.5\ a threshold of 0.50 it counted particles with a mean absolute error of 1.46 per image. The accuracy gain splits roughly equally between newer architecture (+2.8 points), longer training (+2.4) and higher input resolution (+2.9). Polymer classification of located particles is effectively solved; the main remaining challenge is spurious detection of faint, unannotated particles. The model, code and methodology are released for reproducibility.

Summary

Keywords

Microplastics, Nile Red fluorescence, object detection, YOLO26, deep learning, polymer classification, fluorescence microscopy, environmental monitoring

Received

12 March 2026

Accepted

01 November 2026

© 2026 Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence:

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Share article

Article metrics

You just subscribed to receive the final version of the article